TIPB vs. RINF
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPB is actively managed, while RINF is passively managed. Their -0.08 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TIPB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RINF.
Performance
TIPB vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's 3.18% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.15K | $123.66K | $133.91K | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
TIPB vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.18% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and RINF is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RINF
TIPB vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and RINF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -43.51% | +42.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | 0.00% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -16.28% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 4.33% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 12.51% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 12.54% | -9.94% |
TIPB vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIPB vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than RINF's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.63% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and RINF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.63% for RINF.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.30% for RINF.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and RINF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer