RINF vs. TUA
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. RINF is passively managed, while TUA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RINF returned 3.95%/yr vs -0.18%/yr for TUA. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TUA.
Performance
RINF vs. TUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than TUA's -6.11% return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 1.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
TUA
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -6.11%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- -3.80%
- 3Y*
- -0.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF vs. TUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 1.15% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | -4.14% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -6.11% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and TUA is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. TUA — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
TUA
RINF vs. TUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.92 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.52 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | -1.30 | +2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. TUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than TUA's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and TUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -15.85% | -27.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -7.37% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -9.14% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -10.75% | +8.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -8.39% | -8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.93% | -1.55% |
Volatility
RINF vs. TUA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.04%, while Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | TUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 2.72% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 5.28% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 7.03% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 10.75% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 10.75% | +1.80% |
RINF vs. TUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TUA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. TUA - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than TUA's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.75% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.58% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and TUA have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to RINF (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs TUA's -15.85%.
On 3-year performance, RINF leads with 3.95% vs -0.18% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RINF has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 3.58% for TUA.
RINF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while TUA is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.16% for TUA.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and TUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer