RINF vs. TYA
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and TYA (Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while TYA is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. RINF is passively managed, while TYA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RINF returned 3.98%/yr vs -0.87%/yr for TYA. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TYA.
Performance
RINF vs. TYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than TYA's -7.86% return.
RINF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.02%
TYA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- -6.50%
- 3Y*
- -0.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.15K | $123.66K | $133.91K | |
| $285.08K | $301.16K | $687.50K |
RINF vs. TYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.18% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 4.93% |
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -7.86% | 14.38% | -9.63% | -2.23% | -37.62% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and TYA is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | -0.44 |
The correlation between RINF and TYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.43 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. TYA — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
TYA
RINF vs. TYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | TYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.27 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | -0.58 | +4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. TYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum TYA drawdown of -51.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and TYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | TYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -51.15% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -12.24% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -19.13% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.21% | +43.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -36.02% | +19.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 5.63% | -4.70% |
Volatility
RINF vs. TYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) is 1.48%, while Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that RINF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | TYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 3.24% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 9.62% | -6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 12.44% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 20.35% | -7.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 20.35% | -7.81% |
RINF vs. TYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TYA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. TYA - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than TYA's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.63% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
TYA Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.76% | 3.85% | 4.84% | 4.28% | 2.23% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and TYA have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYA has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to RINF (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs TYA's -51.15%.
On 3-year performance, RINF leads with 3.98% vs -0.87% for TYA. On fees, TYA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RINF has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RINF has performed better with a 3.98% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
TYA has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.63% for RINF.
RINF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while TYA is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.15% for TYA.
RINF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and TYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer