TIPB vs. RBIL
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. TIPB is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TIPB charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
TIPB vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12M | $1.89M | $2.34M | |
| $2.11K | $9.22K | $33.66K |
TIPB vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.32% | 0.79% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and RBIL is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
TIPB vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPB | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -0.56% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.13% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -0.08% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 0.97% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 1.06% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 1.06% | +1.54% |
TIPB vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPB has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPB vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, which matches RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 4.16% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and RBIL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPB is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPB is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
TIPB and RBIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.16%.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIPB and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer