TIPB vs. CNRG
TIPB (Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF) and CNRG (SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPB is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while CNRG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. TIPB is actively managed, while CNRG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TIPB vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's 36.68% return.
TIPB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNRG
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 18.72%
- YTD
- 36.68%
- 6M
- 32.67%
- 1Y
- 117.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
TIPB vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.99% | 0.79% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 36.68% | 25.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPB and CNRG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPB vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank
TIPB
CNRG
TIPB vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF (TIPB) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIPB | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.62 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
TIPB vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPB drawdown since its inception was -1.32%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPB and CNRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPB | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -68.49% | +67.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -11.12% | +10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -31.82% | +31.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility
TIPB vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPB | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | 36.49% | -33.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 33.99% | -31.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 35.78% | -33.24% |
Dividends
TIPB vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
TIPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than CNRG's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.01% | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% |
TIPB Northern Trust 2035 Inflation-Linked Distributing Ladder ETF | 3.02% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPB and CNRG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.01% for CNRG.
TIPB is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while CNRG is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street.
Find the right allocation for TIPB and CNRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer