PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIP5.L vs. INXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TIP5.L is traded in USD, while INXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the INXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP5.L achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's -0.20% return.


TIP5.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.03%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.06%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*

INXG.L

1D
0.49%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
0.00%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-9.23%
10Y*
-1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.77%6.22%4.90%4.24%-2.74%5.42%4.91%4.90%0.56%0.16%
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
-0.20%8.73%-10.18%5.45%-41.30%3.13%14.48%10.54%-6.12%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP5.L and INXG.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.31

The correlation between TIP5.L and INXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIP5.L
TIP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

INXG.L
INXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
INXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
INXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
INXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIP5.LINXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.04

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.97

0.30

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.95

0.62

+19.33

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the INXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP5.L and INXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIP5.LINXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

0.17

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

-0.41

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.05

+1.00

Drawdowns

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP5.L drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP5.L and INXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIP5.LINXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-60.41%

+54.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.63%

-7.74%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.51%

-18.39%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.21%

-60.41%

+55.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-42.61%

+42.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-14.98%

+14.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

3.72%

-3.50%

Volatility

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) is 0.54%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that TIP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIP5.LINXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

4.74%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

9.63%

-8.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

13.32%

-11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

22.76%

-19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.18%

19.73%

-16.55%

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TIP5.L and INXG.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIP5.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison

TIP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, less than INXG.L's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
7.56%7.23%5.77%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.61%1.36%1.95%1.28%0.65%1.94%
TIP5.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.81%5.93%6.97%5.15%0.34%0.37%3.00%3.27%2.99%1.03%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIP5.L and INXG.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIP5.L and INXG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

TIP5.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while INXG.L is Government Bonds. TIP5.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP5.L and INXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer