INXG.L vs. CE01.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L).

INXG.L and CE01.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INXG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. CE01.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. Both INXG.L and CE01.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF	1.52%	1.10%	-8.66%	0.16%	-34.27%	4.08%	11.08%	6.27%	-0.49%	2.21%
CE01.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)	-0.87%	6.87%	-3.53%	6.60%	-15.38%	-9.55%	10.06%	1.33%	2.06%	4.55%

Different Trading Currencies

INXG.L is traded in GBP, while CE01.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE01.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INXG.L achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than CE01.L's -0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, INXG.L has underperformed CE01.L with an annualized return of -0.92%, while CE01.L has yielded a comparatively higher 0.60% annualized return.

INXG.L

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 5.22%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: -3.33%
• 5Y*: -7.56%
• 10Y*: -0.92%

CE01.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -2.76%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -0.14%
• 1Y: 5.99%
• 3Y*: 2.16%
• 5Y*: -2.21%
• 10Y*: 0.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INXG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CE01.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CE01.L

iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)

INXG.L

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

INXG.L vs. CE01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INXG.L

INXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
INXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
INXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
INXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
INXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
INXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CE01.L

CE01.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
CE01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CE01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CE01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CE01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CE01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INXG.L	CE01.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.94	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	1.40	-0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.17	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	1.14	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.61	3.53	-1.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the CE01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INXG.L and CE01.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INXG.L	CE01.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	0.94	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	-0.27	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	0.07	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.18	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between INXG.L and CE01.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Dividend Comparison

INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, while CE01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF	7.13%	7.23%	5.77%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.61%	1.36%	1.95%	1.28%	0.65%	1.94%
CE01.L iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INXG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than CE01.L's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INXG.L and CE01.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	INXG.L	CE01.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.87%	-27.47%	-23.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.42%	-5.33%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.87%	-22.14%	-28.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.87%	-27.47%	-23.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.22%	-18.49%	-23.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.48%	-10.20%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	1.72%	+0.96%

Volatility

INXG.L vs. CE01.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE01.L) at 2.54%. This indicates that INXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CE01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INXG.L	CE01.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	2.54%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	4.18%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.36%	6.33%	+4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	8.23%	+11.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	8.90%	+8.53%