PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INXG.L vs. GBPG.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


INXG.LGBPG.L
YTD Return-5.55%-0.20%
1Y Return1.31%3.73%
3Y Return (Ann)-15.47%25.51%
Sharpe Ratio-0.100.75
Sortino Ratio-0.061.09
Omega Ratio0.991.13
Calmar Ratio-0.031.01
Martin Ratio-0.222.26
Ulcer Index5.27%1.31%
Daily Std Dev11.79%4.03%
Max Drawdown-50.87%-7.18%
Current Drawdown-41.79%-2.57%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between INXG.L and GBPG.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, INXG.L achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than GBPG.L's -0.20% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.67%
0.98%
INXG.L
GBPG.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INXG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for INXG.L: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%
Expense ratio chart for GBPG.L: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INXG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INXG.L, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for INXG.L, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for INXG.L, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for INXG.L, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for INXG.L, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.14
GBPG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GBPG.L, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GBPG.L, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GBPG.L, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GBPG.L, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GBPG.L, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.00

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INXG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INXG.L and GBPG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.06
0.63
INXG.L
GBPG.L

Dividends

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Dividend Comparison

INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than GBPG.L's 4.12% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
2.39%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.61%1.36%1.95%1.28%0.65%1.94%2.35%2.75%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.12%3.35%62.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INXG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than GBPG.L's maximum drawdown of -7.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INXG.L and GBPG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-44.28%
-6.78%
INXG.L
GBPG.L

Volatility

INXG.L vs. GBPG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) at 2.71%. This indicates that INXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.61%
2.71%
INXG.L
GBPG.L