INXG.L vs. IGLT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L).
INXG.L and IGLT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INXG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. IGLT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both INXG.L and IGLT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INXG.L or IGLT.L.
Key characteristics
| INXG.L | IGLT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.59% | -3.54% |
| 1Y Return | 0.21% | 2.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -15.98% | -9.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -6.82% | -4.82% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.00% | -0.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.06 | 0.34 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.01 | 0.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.00 | 1.06 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.02 | 0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.15 | 0.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.18% | 3.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.15% | 7.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.87% | -35.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -42.43% | -28.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between INXG.L and IGLT.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, INXG.L achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly lower than IGLT.L's -3.54% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INXG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLT.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Dividend Comparison
INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than IGLT.L's 3.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 2.42% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% | 2.35% | 2.75% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 3.04% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 2.04% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INXG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, which is greater than IGLT.L's maximum drawdown of -35.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INXG.L and IGLT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INXG.L vs. IGLT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that INXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.