INXG.L vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
INXG.L and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INXG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both INXG.L and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INXG.L or IVV.
Key characteristics
| INXG.L | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -6.10% | 26.93% |
| 1Y Return | -1.74% | 35.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -15.59% | 10.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -6.58% | 15.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.05% | 13.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.11 | 3.09 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.08 | 4.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.99 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.03 | 4.48 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.24 | 20.29 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.32% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.52% | 12.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.87% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -42.13% | -0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between INXG.L and IVV is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
INXG.L vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, INXG.L achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 26.93% return. Over the past 10 years, INXG.L has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of -0.05%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INXG.L vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
INXG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INXG.L vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INXG.L vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than IVV's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 5.88% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% | 2.35% | 2.75% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
INXG.L vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INXG.L drawdown since its inception was -50.87%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INXG.L and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INXG.L vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) is 3.57%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that INXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.