TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L).

TIP5.L and XG7U.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TIP5.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. It was launched on Apr 6, 2022. XG7U.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Feb 6, 2013. Both TIP5.L and XG7U.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TIP5.L iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.76%	6.22%	4.87%	4.28%	-2.74%	5.48%	4.88%	4.87%	0.56%	0.01%
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged	0.80%	4.67%	-0.45%	4.13%	-17.08%	5.31%	9.30%	8.31%	-0.09%	0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP5.L achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than XG7U.L's 0.80% return.

TIP5.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: —

XG7U.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 1.87%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: 2.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIP5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7U.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XG7U.L

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged

TIP5.L

iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Return for Risk

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIP5.L

TIP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TIP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
TIP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TIP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
TIP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

XG7U.L

XG7U.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XG7U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XG7U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XG7U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XG7U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIP5.L	XG7U.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	0.56	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	0.80	+1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	1.05	+1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	3.65	+5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP5.L and XG7U.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIP5.L	XG7U.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	0.56	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.20	-0.06	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.32	+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between TIP5.L and XG7U.L is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Dividend Comparison

TIP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, while XG7U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TIP5.L iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	5.89%	5.93%	6.97%	5.15%	0.34%	0.37%	3.01%	3.27%	2.99%	1.03%
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP5.L drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum XG7U.L drawdown of -23.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP5.L and XG7U.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIP5.L	XG7U.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-23.33%	+17.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.51%	-3.38%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.21%	-23.33%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-11.04%	+10.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-6.11%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.97%	-0.52%

Volatility

TIP5.L vs. XG7U.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TIP5.L) is 0.80%, while Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that TIP5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIP5.L	XG7U.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	1.94%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.46%	3.71%	-2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	5.65%	-2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.89%	7.76%	-4.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.18%	6.99%	-3.81%