TINT vs. PWRZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TINT is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.

Performance

TINT vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TINT

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.31%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWRZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	0.19%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and PWRZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

TINT vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 33
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINT	PWRZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	—	—

Drawdowns

TINT vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and PWRZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	PWRZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-0.40%	-40.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.83%	-0.40%	-9.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.78%	-0.31%	-20.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TINT	PWRZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	0.62%	+23.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	0.62%	+22.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	0.62%	+22.90%

TINT vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	1.19%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and PWRZ in my portfolio?

TINT and PWRZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TINT or PWRZ?

On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or PWRZ?

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or PWRZ?

TINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between TINT and PWRZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.75% for PWRZ.