INFR vs. BKGI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. INFR is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

INFR vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKGI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 12.05%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: 21.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	14.63%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and BKGI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between INFR and BKGI has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INFR vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INFR	BKGI
Utilities	68.5%	46.8%
Industrials	27.5%	11.8%
Real Estate	4.1%	18.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	20.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

INFR vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 79
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INFR	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.31	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	INFR	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-14.79%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.04%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.56%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFR	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.54%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.99%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.99%	—

INFR vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFR vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.88%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFR and BKGI in my portfolio?

INFR and BKGI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INFR or BKGI?

On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFR or BKGI?

INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFR or BKGI?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.71% for INFR.

What is the main difference between INFR and BKGI?

They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.65% for BKGI.