TINT vs. GSG
TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.12%/yr vs 19.31%/yr for GSG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
TINT vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.
TINT
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 44.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
TINT vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 25.24% | 16.13% | -13.37% | 20.04% | -28.14% | 1.71% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | -3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINT and GSG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TINT and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINT vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
TINT
GSG
TINT vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 5.47 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 14.39 | -5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.26 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.09 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
TINT vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -89.62% | +48.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | -9.46% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.42% | -14.94% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -56.95% | +54.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -63.71% | +42.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 3.59% | +1.24% |
Volatility
TINT vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.65%. This indicates that TINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 7.65% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 20.42% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.75% | 22.95% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 22.61% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 22.03% | +1.43% |
TINT vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINT vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINT and GSG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINT has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to GSG (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 3-year performance, GSG leads with 19.31% vs 10.12% for TINT. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSG has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
TINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while GSG is Commodities. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TINT and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer