TINT vs. BITU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TINT returned 22.79% vs -80.42% for BITU. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.

Performance

TINT vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -58.86% return.

TINT

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.31%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITU

• 1D: -5.16%
• 1M: -6.57%
• 6M: -62.01%
• YTD: -58.86%
• 1Y: -80.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	15.25%	16.13%	-12.88%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-58.86%	-37.07%	41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and BITU is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

TINT vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 33
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINT	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	-0.91	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	-1.86	+3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.80	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	-0.97	+2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	-1.43	+5.81

TINT vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINT vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-83.45%	+42.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	-83.45%	+65.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.83%	-81.60%	+71.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.78%	-36.56%	+15.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	56.22%	-51.00%

Volatility

TINT vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 7.63%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 22.54%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINT	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	22.54%	-14.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.32%	70.09%	-48.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	88.23%	-63.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	96.86%	-73.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	96.86%	-73.34%

TINT vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than BITU's 93.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	93.76%	50.23%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	1.19%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and BITU in my portfolio?

TINT and BITU have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINT or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to TINT (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs BITU's -83.45%.

Which ETF is better, TINT or BITU?

On 1-year performance, TINT leads with 22.79% vs -80.42% for BITU. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINT or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, TINT has performed better with a 22.79% return vs -80.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or BITU?

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 93.76%, compared with 1.19% for TINT.

What is the main difference between TINT and BITU?

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.95% for BITU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.