PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIME vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIME vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIME achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.15% return.


TIME

1D
1.18%
1M
1.28%
6M
7.90%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.58%

XOMO

1D
-0.09%
1M
10.85%
6M
7.87%
YTD
20.15%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.24K$43.99K$100.40K
$559.24K$694.66K$715.05K

TIME vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
7.94%10.17%5.94%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
20.15%6.90%-0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TIME and XOMO is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024

-0.04

The correlation between TIME and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIME vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIME vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIMEXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.74

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

4.35

+0.23

TIME vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIME Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIME and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIME vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIME drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIME and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMEXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-18.90%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-17.25%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-7.65%

+5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-7.50%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

6.89%

-3.06%

Volatility

TIME vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) is 4.07%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that TIME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIMEXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

6.21%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

17.24%

-6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

20.67%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.19%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.19%

-1.64%

TIME vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIME has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIME vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, less than XOMO's 37.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TIME
Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF
9.28%10.02%15.84%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.07%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIME and XOMO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to TIME (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIME dropped -24.26% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.81% vs 17.48% for TIME. On fees, TIME is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.81% return vs 17.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIME is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.07%, compared with 9.28% for TIME.

TIME is categorized as Technology Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Clockwise and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for TIME and 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIME and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer