PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIME vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TIME vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TIME vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIME achieves a -7.92% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's -6.56% return.


TIME

1D
2.20%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
-7.92%
6M
-6.35%
1Y
11.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GINN

1D
3.43%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-6.35%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TIME vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIME has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TIME vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIME
TIME Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIME vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIMEGINNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.83

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.31

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.26

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

4.47

-1.00

TIME vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIME Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIME and GINN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIMEGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.83

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between TIME and GINN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TIME vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than GINN's 1.35% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TIME
Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF
10.88%10.02%15.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.35%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%

Drawdowns

TIME vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIME drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIME and GINN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TIMEGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-41.25%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-13.57%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.18%

-10.21%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-13.72%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.82%

-0.43%

Volatility

TIME vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME) is 5.31%, while Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that TIME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TIMEGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

6.74%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

12.62%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

21.05%

-6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

21.29%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

21.18%

-3.19%