PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILL vs. USOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILL vs. USOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 47.45% return.


TILL

1D
-1.13%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
5.10%
6M
3.12%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
-5.74%
5Y*
10Y*

USOI

1D
-2.04%
1M
0.59%
YTD
47.45%
6M
44.00%
1Y
46.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILL vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TILL and USOI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILL vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL
TILL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILLUSOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.35

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.92

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

9.08

-9.32

TILL vs. USOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the USOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and USOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILLUSOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

2.08

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.89

-1.45

Drawdowns

TILL vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than USOI's maximum drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and USOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILLUSOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-19.49%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-11.90%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.47%

-5.06%

-24.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.40%

-7.20%

-14.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

5.13%

+0.28%

Volatility

TILL vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 5.38%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILLUSOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

10.37%

-4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

18.34%

-8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

22.46%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.74%

22.61%

-7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

22.61%

-7.87%

TILL vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILL vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than USOI's 37.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
4.72%4.97%2.55%51.24%0.73%
USOI
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN
37.65%27.21%12.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILL and USOI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOI has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to TILL (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs USOI's -19.49%.

On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 46.39% vs -1.33% for TILL. On fees, USOI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 46.39% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USOI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

USOI has the higher dividend yield at 37.65%, compared with 4.72% for TILL.

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.85% for USOI.

USOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILL and USOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer