PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILE vs. CCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TILE vs. CCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILE achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than CCB's -31.41% return.


TILE

1D
-2.89%
1M
1.35%
6M
7.98%
YTD
15.94%
1Y
51.84%
3Y*
52.76%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
8.29%

CCB

1D
0.17%
1M
6.90%
6M
-28.81%
YTD
-31.41%
1Y
-22.61%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
21.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILE vs. CCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TILE
Interface, Inc.
15.94%14.94%93.36%28.46%-37.92%52.33%-35.88%18.47%-38.44%
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
-31.41%34.95%91.20%-6.54%-6.12%141.05%27.50%8.14%-6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TILE and CCB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.38

The correlation between TILE and CCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TILE:

$1.88B

CCB:

$1.20B

EPS

TILE:

$3.21

CCB:

$4.78

PE Ratio

TILE:

10.06

CCB:

16.43

PEG Ratio

TILE:

0.21

CCB:

1.67

PS Ratio

TILE:

0.90

CCB:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

TILE:

$1.42B

CCB:

$422.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TILE:

$553.14M

CCB:

$195.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

TILE:

$198.07M

CCB:

$52.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILE vs. CCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILE
TILE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TILE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TILE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CCB
CCB Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILE vs. CCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TILECCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.93

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

-0.53

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

-0.94

+5.14

TILE vs. CCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CCB Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILE and CCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TILE vs. CCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILE drawdown since its inception was -92.60%, which is greater than CCB's maximum drawdown of -50.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILE and CCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILECCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.60%

-50.22%

-42.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.88%

-42.99%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.61%

-42.99%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.36%

-42.99%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.13%

-33.93%

+23.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-14.90%

-22.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.39%

24.08%

-11.69%

Volatility

TILE vs. CCB - Volatility Comparison

Interface, Inc. (TILE) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to Coastal Financial Corporation (CCB) at 8.15%. This indicates that TILE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILECCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

8.15%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.23%

30.76%

-5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.12%

40.53%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.84%

38.26%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.03%

47.72%

-2.69%

Dividends

TILE vs. CCB - Dividend Comparison

TILE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while CCB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILE
Interface, Inc.
0.31%0.21%0.16%0.32%0.41%0.25%0.90%1.57%1.82%0.99%1.19%0.94%

Financials

TILE vs. CCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interface, Inc. and Coastal Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
331.04M
0
(TILE) Total Revenue
(CCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TILE and CCB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILE has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to CCB (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILE dropped -92.60% vs CCB's -50.22%.

TILE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILE and CCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer