PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILE vs. AER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TILE vs. AER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interface, Inc. (TILE) and AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILE achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than AER's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TILE has underperformed AER with an annualized return of 6.30%, while AER has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


TILE

1D
1.08%
1M
9.03%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.17%
1Y
44.04%
3Y*
58.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
6.30%

AER

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
18.99%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILE vs. AER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILE
Interface, Inc.
4.31%14.94%93.36%28.46%-37.92%52.33%-35.88%18.47%-42.66%37.28%
AER
AerCap Holdings N.V.
-5.93%51.66%29.81%27.43%-10.85%43.53%-25.85%55.23%-24.73%26.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TILE and AER is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2006

0.43

The correlation between TILE and AER shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TILE:

$2.86

AER:

$22.98

PE Ratio

TILE:

10.19

AER:

5.85

PEG Ratio

TILE:

0.21

AER:

0.15

PS Ratio

TILE:

0.91

AER:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

TILE:

$1.42B

AER:

$8.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TILE:

$553.14M

AER:

$4.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

TILE:

$198.07M

AER:

$6.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILE vs. AER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILE
TILE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TILE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TILE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AER
AER Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AER Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AER Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AER Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AER Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILE vs. AER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interface, Inc. (TILE) and AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILEAERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.70

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

1.16

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.18

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.62

3.20

+0.42

TILE vs. AER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the AER Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILE and AER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILEAERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.70

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.33

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.19

-0.11

Drawdowns

TILE vs. AER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILE drawdown since its inception was -92.60%, roughly equal to the maximum AER drawdown of -94.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILE and AER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILEAERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.60%

-94.38%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.88%

-14.77%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.61%

-15.66%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.71%

-45.14%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.99%

-75.86%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.48%

-12.65%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.89%

-28.39%

-9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.21%

5.46%

+6.75%

Volatility

TILE vs. AER - Volatility Comparison

Interface, Inc. (TILE) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) at 9.54%. This indicates that TILE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILEAERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

9.54%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.78%

20.14%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.17%

24.89%

+12.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.70%

32.31%

+10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.99%

41.91%

+3.08%

Dividends

TILE vs. AER - Dividend Comparison

TILE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than AER's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AER
AerCap Holdings N.V.
1.00%0.75%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILE
Interface, Inc.
0.24%0.21%0.16%0.32%0.41%0.25%0.90%1.57%1.82%0.99%1.19%0.94%

Financials

TILE vs. AER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Interface, Inc. and AerCap Holdings N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
331.04M
2.16B
(TILE) Total Revenue
(AER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TILE vs. AER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Interface, Inc. and AerCap Holdings N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
38.3%
65.4%
Portfolio components
TILE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a gross profit of 126.72M and revenue of 331.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.

AER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

TILE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interface, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.33M and revenue of 331.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

AER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.

TILE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a net income of 23.61M and revenue of 331.04M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

AER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported a net income of 818.12M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TILE and AER have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to AER (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILE dropped -92.60% vs AER's -94.38%.

TILE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILE and AER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer