TILE vs. AWI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).

Performance

TILE vs. AWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TILE vs. AWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TILE Interface, Inc.	-10.64%	14.94%	93.36%	28.46%	-37.92%	52.33%	-35.88%	18.47%	-42.66%	37.28%
AWI Armstrong World Industries, Inc.	-13.59%	36.23%	45.05%	45.37%	-40.26%	57.44%	-19.97%	62.79%	-3.61%	44.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TILE : $1.47B AWI : $7.19B
EPS TILE : $1.96 AWI : $7.07
PE Ratio TILE : 12.70 AWI : 23.29
PEG Ratio TILE : 0.26 AWI : 1.41
PS Ratio TILE : 1.06 AWI : 4.44
PB Ratio TILE : 1.22 AWI : 3.73
Total Revenue (TTM) TILE : $1.39B AWI : $1.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) TILE : $537.38M AWI : $658.70M
EBITDA (TTM) TILE : $197.92M AWI : $613.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILE achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly higher than AWI's -13.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TILE has underperformed AWI with an annualized return of 4.02%, while AWI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.

TILE

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -20.77%
• YTD: -10.64%
• 6M: -13.73%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 45.77%
• 5Y*: 14.77%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

AWI

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -4.82%
• YTD: -13.59%
• 6M: -15.61%
• 1Y: 17.85%
• 3Y*: 33.55%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TILE vs. AWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILE

TILE Risk / Return Rank: 64
TILE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TILE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TILE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TILE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TILE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

AWI

AWI Risk / Return Rank: 62
AWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AWI Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AWI Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILE vs. AWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interface, Inc. (TILE) and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TILE	AWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.67	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.10	+0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	0.89	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.89	2.63	+0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TILE vs. AWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the AWI Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILE and AWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TILE	AWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	0.67	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.52	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09	0.46	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.32	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between TILE and AWI is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TILE vs. AWI - Dividend Comparison

TILE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than AWI's 0.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TILE Interface, Inc.	0.32%	0.21%	0.16%	0.32%	0.41%	0.25%	0.90%	1.57%	1.82%	0.99%	1.19%	0.94%
AWI Armstrong World Industries, Inc.	0.79%	0.66%	0.81%	1.06%	1.38%	0.74%	1.09%	0.77%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TILE vs. AWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILE drawdown since its inception was -92.60%, which is greater than AWI's maximum drawdown of -80.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILE and AWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TILE	AWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.60%	-80.98%	-11.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.88%	-21.29%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.71%	-46.06%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.99%	-46.44%	-31.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.45%	-18.80%	-9.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.98%	-18.25%	-19.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.21%	7.22%	+1.99%

Volatility

TILE vs. AWI - Volatility Comparison

Interface, Inc. (TILE) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) at 6.71%. This indicates that TILE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TILE	AWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	6.71%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.45%	18.76%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.30%	26.64%	+10.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.45%	26.10%	+16.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.82%	30.19%	+14.63%

Financials

TILE vs. AWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Interface, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TILE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a gross profit of 134.81M and revenue of 349.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.6%.

AWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 154.50M and revenue of 388.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

TILE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Interface, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 349.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

AWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.40M and revenue of 388.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.7%.

TILE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Interface, Inc. reported a net income of 24.39M and revenue of 349.39M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

AWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 65.50M and revenue of 388.30M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.