TIER vs. IDHQ
TIER (T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TIER is actively managed, while IDHQ is passively managed. Over the past year, TIER returned 24.30% vs 35.93% for IDHQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TIER charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
TIER vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIER achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 24.14% return.
TIER
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDHQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 24.14%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
TIER vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 11.34% | 12.72% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 24.14% | 9.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIER and IDHQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TIER and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIER vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
TIER
IDHQ
TIER vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIER | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.69 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 10.55 | -2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIER vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIER drawdown since its inception was -12.07%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIER and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIER | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -73.84% | +61.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.07% | -13.44% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -2.44% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -21.07% | +19.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.41% | -0.26% |
Volatility
TIER vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF (TIER) is 5.39%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that TIER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIER | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 5.73% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.89% | 18.90% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 20.74% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 17.83% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 17.96% | -1.49% |
TIER vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIER has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TIER vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
TIER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than IDHQ's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.04% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
TIER T. Rowe Price International Equity Research ETF | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TIER and IDHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IDHQ has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to TIER (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIER dropped -12.07% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.
On 1-year performance, IDHQ leads with 35.93% vs 24.30% for TIER. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TIER has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 35.93% return vs 24.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TIER.
IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.67% for TIER.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TIER and 0.29% for IDHQ.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TIER and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer