THTA vs. BABW
THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) and BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. THTA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABW.
Performance
THTA vs. BABW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THTA achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than BABW's -17.95% return.
THTA
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.38%
BABW
- 1D
- 4.66%
- 1M
- 38.27%
- 6M
- -30.25%
- YTD
- -17.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $94.03K | $69.08K | $57.32K | |
| $796.37K | $899.50K | $774.37K |
THTA vs. BABW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 9.58% | 3.39% |
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -17.95% | -16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between THTA and BABW is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THTA vs. BABW — Risk / Return Rank
THTA
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THTA vs. BABW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THTA vs. BABW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THTA drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum BABW drawdown of -54.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THTA and BABW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -54.76% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -36.38% | +31.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -26.97% | +19.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
THTA vs. BABW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.19% | 50.55% | -44.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 50.55% | -30.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 50.55% | -30.87% |
THTA vs. BABW - Expense Ratio Comparison
THTA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BABW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
THTA vs. BABW - Dividend Comparison
THTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%, less than BABW's 46.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 46.50% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 10.90% | 12.66% | 12.44% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THTA and BABW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 46.50%, compared with 10.90% for THTA.
They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for THTA and 0.99% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for THTA and BABW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer