THTA vs. BABW
THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) and BABW (Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THTA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BABW.
Performance
THTA vs. BABW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THTA achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly higher than BABW's -28.86% return.
THTA
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABW
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -39.00%
- YTD
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THTA vs. BABW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 8.16% | 3.39% |
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | -28.86% | -16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between THTA and BABW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THTA vs. BABW — Risk / Return Rank
THTA
BABW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THTA vs. BABW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF (BABW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THTA vs. BABW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THTA drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum BABW drawdown of -54.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THTA and BABW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -54.76% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.66% | -44.84% | +39.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -25.80% | +18.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | — | — |
Volatility
THTA vs. BABW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THTA | BABW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 50.27% | -44.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 50.27% | -30.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 50.27% | -30.43% |
THTA vs. BABW - Expense Ratio Comparison
THTA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BABW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
THTA vs. BABW - Dividend Comparison
THTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, less than BABW's 49.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABW Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF | 49.23% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 11.09% | 12.66% | 12.44% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THTA and BABW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABW.
BABW has the higher dividend yield at 49.23%, compared with 11.09% for THTA.
They also come from different issuers: SoFi and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for THTA and 0.99% for BABW.
Find the right allocation for THTA and BABW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer