THRO vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THRO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by iShares, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. THRO is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, THRO returned 24.41%/yr vs 25.02%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. THRO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

THRO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.

THRO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 6.78%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THRO vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF	12.78%	15.04%	32.03%	24.40%	-17.85%	2.14%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between THRO and SCHG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.92

The correlation between THRO and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

THRO vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THRO	SCHG
Technology	40.7%	46.3%
Financial Services	12.1%	6.7%
Communication Services	11.6%	16.0%
Industrials	10.4%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	1.7%
Healthcare	6.6%	7.7%
Energy	1.7%	0.8%
Basic Materials	0.9%	1.4%
Utilities	0.1%	0.4%
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

THRO vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THRO

THRO Risk / Return Rank: 57
THRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
THRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
THRO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
THRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
THRO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THRO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THRO	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.60	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.18	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	1.51	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.84	5.04	+5.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THRO vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THRO and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THRO	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	1.60	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.84	-0.10

Drawdowns

THRO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	THRO	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.54%	-34.59%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-16.41%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	-23.39%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-1.78%	+1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-5.20%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	4.90%	-2.45%

Volatility

THRO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THRO	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	3.61%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	11.62%	-1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.00%	15.50%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	22.27%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	21.55%	-2.83%

THRO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

THRO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

THRO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF	0.16%	0.15%	0.73%	0.55%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THRO and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, THRO and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, THRO or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to THRO (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRO dropped -26.54% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, THRO or SCHG?

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 25.02% vs 24.41% for THRO. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, THRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THRO or SCHG?

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 25.02% return vs 24.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THRO or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for THRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THRO or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.16% for THRO.

What is the main difference between THRO and SCHG?

THRO is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for THRO and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.