THRO vs. COWG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).
THRO and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. THRO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Dec 14, 2021. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022.
Performance
THRO vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
THRO vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | -6.03% | 15.04% | 32.03% | 24.40% | 0.49% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -4.15% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRO achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's -4.15% return.
THRO
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -4.26%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
THRO vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
THRO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
THRO vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
THRO
COWG
THRO vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THRO | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.44 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.78 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.75 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 2.44 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THRO | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.44 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.93 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between THRO and COWG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
THRO vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
THRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than COWG's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 0.19% | 0.15% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.90% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
THRO vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRO drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRO and COWG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRO | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -23.60% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -12.96% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -8.21% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -3.35% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.96% | -1.22% |
Volatility
THRO vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is 5.66%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that THRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| THRO | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 6.09% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 13.24% | -2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 22.50% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 19.34% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 19.34% | -0.45% |