THRM vs. CLS
THRM (Gentherm Incorporated) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. THRM operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, THRM returned 2.53%/yr vs 40.47%/yr for CLS. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
THRM vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with THRM having a 11.58% return and CLS slightly higher at 12.12%. Over the past 10 years, THRM has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 2.53%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 40.47% annualized return.
THRM
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 19.78%
- 6M
- 26.97%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- -14.99%
- 5Y*
- -13.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.04%
CLS
- 1D
- -6.00%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 70.20%
- 3Y*
- 149.34%
- 5Y*
- 106.30%
- 10Y*
- 40.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.16B | $852.74M | $822.47M | |
| $30.60M | $20.21M | $14.43M |
THRM vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THRM Gentherm Incorporated | 11.58% | -8.90% | -23.75% | -19.80% | -24.87% | 33.24% | 46.92% | 11.03% | 25.92% | -6.20% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 12.12% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRM and CLS is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998 | 0.23 |
The correlation between THRM and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
THRM:
$1.24B
CLS:
$38.11B
THRM:
$0.86
CLS:
$9.64
THRM:
47.15
CLS:
34.38
THRM:
1.00
CLS:
2.46
THRM:
1.74
CLS:
15.53
THRM:
$1.26B
CLS:
$15.62B
THRM:
$369.10M
CLS:
$1.81B
THRM:
$100.08M
CLS:
$1.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRM vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
THRM
CLS
THRM vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRM | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.83 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 4.27 | -2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRM vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRM drawdown since its inception was -99.08%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRM and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRM | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.08% | -96.93% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.32% | -36.21% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.00% | -53.96% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.34% | -53.96% | -22.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.34% | -80.60% | +4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.84% | -29.84% | -29.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.30% | -73.10% | +11.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | 15.47% | -1.58% |
Volatility
THRM vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 26.33% and 25.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRM | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.33% | 25.97% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.20% | 55.62% | -18.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.55% | 74.89% | -29.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 58.52% | -16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.17% | 50.65% | -11.48% |
Dividends
THRM vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither THRM nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
THRM vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gentherm Incorporated and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THRM vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
THRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported a gross profit of 96.43M and revenue of 96.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 577.50M and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
THRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported an operating income of 10.69M and revenue of 96.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 458.30M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
THRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gentherm Incorporated reported a net income of 4.42M and revenue of 96.43M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 368.80M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THRM and CLS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THRM has higher volatility (26.33%) compared to CLS (25.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THRM dropped -99.08% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THRM and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer