PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 29.33% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.65%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


ROBO

1D
-0.77%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.40%
1Y
59.43%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
13.65%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
29.33%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%44.26%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and VOO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.83

The correlation between ROBO and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBO
VOO

Industrials

46.8%
8.3%

Technology

41.9%
35.7%

Healthcare

4.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
10.2%

Financial Services

2.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

1.1%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Industrials

ROBO
46.8%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

ROBO
41.9%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

ROBO
4.9%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBO
3.1%
VOO
10.2%

Financial Services

ROBO
2.2%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

ROBO
1.3%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

ROBO
1.1%
VOO
11.3%

Basic Materials

ROBO

-

VOO
1.8%

Energy

ROBO

-

VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

ROBO

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

ROBO

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.16

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

14.73

-0.95

ROBO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.39

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.83

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.87

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.89

-0.39

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-33.99%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-8.90%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-18.69%

-9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-24.52%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-33.99%

-9.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.70%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-3.69%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

1.91%

+2.42%

Volatility

ROBO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

2.84%

+4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

8.90%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.01%

11.80%

+11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.63%

16.81%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

18.01%

+5.15%

ROBO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.33%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and VOO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBO has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 13.65% for ROBO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.33% for ROBO.

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while VOO is S&P 500. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.03% for VOO.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer