THNQ vs. NBDS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THNQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index, while NBDS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. THNQ is passively managed, while NBDS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, THNQ returned 30.82%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for NBDS. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. THNQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NBDS.

Performance

THNQ vs. NBDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THNQ achieves a 33.15% return, which is significantly higher than NBDS's 9.49% return.

THNQ

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -4.13%
• 6M: 31.35%
• YTD: 33.15%
• 1Y: 55.63%
• 3Y*: 30.82%
• 5Y*: 14.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.75%

NBDS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.09%
• 6M: 14.36%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 1Y: 15.81%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	$2.98M	$1.83M	$2.43M
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	$1.82M	$1.71M	$2.47M

THNQ vs. NBDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	33.15%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-26.15%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	9.49%	19.58%	17.97%	38.55%	-24.78%

Correlation

The correlation between THNQ and NBDS is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022	0.91

The correlation between THNQ and NBDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

THNQ vs. NBDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THNQ	NBDS
Technology	78.5%	60.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	5.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	3.4%
Healthcare	3.8%	15.5%
Industrials	1.3%	8.0%
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

THNQ vs. NBDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 22
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 23
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THNQ vs. NBDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THNQ	NBDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.49	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	0.86	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.10	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	0.57	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	1.47	+6.46

THNQ vs. NBDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the NBDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THNQ and NBDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THNQ vs. NBDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THNQ drawdown since its inception was -50.56%, which is greater than NBDS's maximum drawdown of -29.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THNQ and NBDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	THNQ	NBDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-29.93%	-20.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.39%	-23.96%	+5.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.88%	-28.51%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.60%	-8.57%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.88%	-9.37%	-5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	9.38%	-2.93%

Volatility

THNQ vs. NBDS - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) at 9.01%. This indicates that THNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THNQ	NBDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.75%	9.01%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.75%	23.32%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.08%	27.95%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.80%	28.03%	+1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.97%	28.03%	+0.94%

THNQ vs. NBDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

THNQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than NBDS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

THNQ vs. NBDS - Dividend Comparison

THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than NBDS's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.35%	0.38%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THNQ and NBDS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, THNQ and NBDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, THNQ or NBDS?

THNQ has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to NBDS (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THNQ dropped -50.56% vs NBDS's -29.93%.

Which ETF is better, THNQ or NBDS?

On 3-year performance, THNQ leads with 30.82% vs 17.53% for NBDS. On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, NBDS has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THNQ or NBDS?

Over the 3-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 30.82% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THNQ or NBDS?

NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THNQ or NBDS?

NBDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between THNQ and NBDS?

THNQ is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while NBDS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for THNQ and 0.55% for NBDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.