RHRX vs. ARP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and ARP (PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RHRX returned 18.76%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ARP. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ARP.

Performance

RHRX vs. ARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than ARP's 8.24% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 14.17%
• YTD: 16.73%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

ARP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.24%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: 13.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARP PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF	$115.46K	$121.20K	$189.42K
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	$188.47K	$260.91K	$203.87K

RHRX vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	16.73%	16.70%	22.21%	10.28%	-1.50%
ARP PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF	8.24%	18.33%	13.79%	3.66%	-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and ARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.70

The correlation between RHRX and ARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

RHRX vs. ARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RHRX	ARP
Technology	39.5%	39.5%
Industrials	14.9%	9.7%
Financial Services	9.2%	11.0%
Basic Materials	8.4%	3.8%
Healthcare	6.7%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	9.4%
Communication Services	5.2%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	5.6%
Energy	2.7%	2.7%
Utilities	1.9%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.3%

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 84
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

ARP

ARP Risk / Return Rank: 63
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RHRX vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.50	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.94	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	2.23	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	7.39	+5.22

RHRX vs. ARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and ARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and ARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-10.13%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-10.13%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-10.13%	-11.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-3.29%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-1.90%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	3.05%	-0.84%

Volatility

RHRX vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is 3.30%, while PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that RHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.87%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	13.00%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.43%	15.06%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	10.51%	+8.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	10.51%	+8.47%

RHRX vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHRX vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARP PMV Adaptive Risk Parity ETF	6.04%	6.54%	5.29%	2.67%	0.06%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHRX and ARP in my portfolio?

RHRX and ARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RHRX or ARP?

ARP has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to RHRX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs ARP's -10.13%.

Which ETF is better, RHRX or ARP?

On 3-year performance, RHRX leads with 18.76% vs 13.08% for ARP. On fees, RHRX is cheaper at 1.36% per year. On volatility, RHRX has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RHRX or ARP?

Over the 3-year period, RHRX has performed better with a 18.76% return vs 13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHRX or ARP?

RHRX is cheaper with a 1.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHRX or ARP?

ARP has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

What is the main difference between RHRX and ARP?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and PMV. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 1.42% for ARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.