RHRX vs. ARP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP).

RHRX and ARP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RHRX is an actively managed fund by Adaptive. It was launched on Sep 20, 2012. ARP is an actively managed fund by PMV. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022.

Performance

RHRX vs. ARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RHRX vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	3.20%	16.70%	22.21%	10.28%	0.41%
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF	3.90%	18.33%	13.79%	3.66%	-0.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than ARP's 3.90% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 4.20%
• 1Y: 28.65%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARP

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -6.99%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 20.84%
• 3Y*: 13.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.

ARP

Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 84
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

ARP

ARP Risk / Return Rank: 80
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.53	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.98	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	2.12	+0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	9.09	+3.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RHRX vs. ARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the ARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and ARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.53	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	1.18	-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and ARP is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RHRX vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF	6.29%	6.54%	5.29%	2.67%	0.06%

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and ARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-10.13%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.82%	-10.13%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-6.99%	+3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-1.77%	-7.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.36%	+0.05%

Volatility

RHRX vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) is 4.97%, while Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that RHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	ARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	7.58%	-2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	12.65%	-2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	13.66%	+5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	10.13%	+9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	10.13%	+9.05%