RHRX vs. RHTX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and RHTX (RH Tactical Outlook ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds from Adaptive. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RHRX returned 18.76%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for RHTX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for RHTX.

Performance

RHRX vs. RHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than RHTX's 4.56% return.

RHRX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 14.17%
• YTD: 16.73%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

RHTX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.39%
• 6M: 0.48%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 1Y: 16.76%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	$188.47K	$260.91K	$203.87K
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	$30.81K	$22.61K	$11.11K

RHRX vs. RHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	16.73%	16.70%	22.21%	10.28%	-20.05%	1.33%
RHTX RH Tactical Outlook ETF	4.56%	15.42%	18.27%	7.02%	-19.72%	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and RHTX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2021	0.84

The correlation between RHRX and RHTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

RHRX vs. RHTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RHRX	RHTX
Technology	39.5%	30.4%
Industrials	14.9%	13.7%
Financial Services	9.2%	12.8%
Basic Materials	8.4%	2.8%
Healthcare	6.7%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	9.7%
Communication Services	5.2%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.9%
Energy	2.7%	3.7%
Utilities	1.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.4%	4.0%

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. RHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 84
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

RHTX

RHTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
RHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
RHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RHRX vs. RHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RHRX	RHTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	0.97	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.33	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.18	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	1.20	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	3.88	+8.74

RHRX vs. RHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the RHTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and RHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. RHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, roughly equal to the maximum RHTX drawdown of -24.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and RHTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	RHTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-24.68%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-12.77%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-18.73%	-3.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-5.05%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-9.43%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	3.94%	-1.73%

Volatility

RHRX vs. RHTX - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and RH Tactical Outlook ETF (RHTX) have volatilities of 3.30% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	RHTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.47%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	13.11%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.43%	15.87%	-1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.98%	17.94%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	17.94%	+1.04%

RHRX vs. RHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RHTX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHRX vs. RHTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither RHRX nor RHTX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHRX and RHTX in my portfolio?

RHRX and RHTX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RHRX or RHTX?

RHTX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to RHRX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs RHTX's -24.68%.

Which ETF is better, RHRX or RHTX?

On 3-year performance, RHRX leads with 18.76% vs 12.09% for RHTX. On fees, RHRX is cheaper at 1.36% per year. On volatility, RHRX has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RHRX or RHTX?

Over the 3-year period, RHRX has performed better with a 18.76% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHRX or RHTX?

RHRX is cheaper with a 1.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for RHTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHRX or RHTX?

RHRX and RHTX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RHRX and RHTX?

Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 1.38% for RHTX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.