THLV vs. PRAY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THLV is a Equal Weight fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while PRAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NONE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, THLV returned 9.68%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for PRAY. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for PRAY.

Performance

THLV vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRAY's 12.64% return.

THLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -2.87%
• 6M: 2.97%
• YTD: 8.51%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 9.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

PRAY

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 8.04%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 1Y: 16.05%
• 3Y*: 13.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	$230.70K	$478.28K	$359.91K
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	$336.07K	$335.31K	$358.63K

THLV vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	8.51%	10.50%	9.52%	5.88%	1.22%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	12.64%	9.08%	13.02%	20.02%	-3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between THLV and PRAY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022	0.75

The correlation between THLV and PRAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

THLV vs. PRAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THLV	PRAY
Energy	17.5%	3.2%
Technology	17.5%	28.5%
Consumer Cyclical	15.5%	13.1%
Real Estate	14.0%	1.5%
Utilities	14.0%	3.8%
Financial Services	13.8%	12.5%
Industrials	13.8%	16.2%
Consumer Defensive	13.7%	3.4%
Healthcare	12.5%	7.0%
Basic Materials	11.3%	3.0%
Communication Services	0.1%	7.7%

Return for Risk

THLV vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THLV

THLV Risk / Return Rank: 55
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 53
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 48
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THLV vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	THLV	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.12	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.71	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.20	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	1.80	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	6.89	-0.66

THLV vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THLV and PRAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

THLV vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, smaller than the maximum PRAY drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and PRAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	THLV	PRAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-21.40%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.66%	-8.80%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-17.13%	+3.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-2.66%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-5.33%	+1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.30%	-0.06%

Volatility

THLV vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) is 2.84%, while FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that THLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THLV	PRAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	4.62%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	12.20%	-4.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	14.20%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.74%	16.08%	-4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.74%	16.08%	-4.34%

THLV vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

THLV vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than PRAY's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.61%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF	1.63%	1.77%	1.25%	2.72%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THLV and PRAY in my portfolio?

THLV and PRAY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THLV or PRAY?

PRAY has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to THLV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THLV dropped -13.15% vs PRAY's -21.40%.

Which ETF is better, THLV or PRAY?

On 3-year performance, PRAY leads with 13.31% vs 9.68% for THLV. On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, THLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THLV or PRAY?

Over the 3-year period, PRAY has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THLV or PRAY?

THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PRAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THLV or PRAY?

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.61% for PRAY.

What is the main difference between THLV and PRAY?

THLV is categorized as Equal Weight, while PRAY is Large Cap Blend Equities. THLV tracks THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while PRAY tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: THOR and Faith Investor Services. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.69% for PRAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.