PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THLV vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THLV vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.


THLV

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.27%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.41%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THLV vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THLV and BUFH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THLV vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THLV vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THLVBUFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

THLV vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THLVBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

2.91

-2.03

Drawdowns

THLV vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THLVBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.15%

-1.53%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-0.05%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-0.18%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

Volatility

THLV vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THLVBUFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

2.37%

+7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

2.37%

+9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

2.37%

+9.36%

THLV vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

THLV vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFH
FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.62%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


THLV and BUFH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

THLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: THOR and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THLV and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer