THLV vs. BUFH
THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - THLV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THLV charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
THLV vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THLV achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
THLV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THLV vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 9.49% | 7.58% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between THLV and BUFH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THLV vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
THLV
BUFH
THLV vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| THLV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THLV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 2.91 | -2.03 |
Drawdowns
THLV vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THLV drawdown since its inception was -13.15%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THLV and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THLV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -1.53% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -0.05% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -0.18% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility
THLV vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THLV | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.84% | 2.37% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 2.37% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 2.37% | +9.36% |
THLV vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
THLV has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
THLV vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
THLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THLV and BUFH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THLV is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THLV is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
THLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: THOR and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for THLV and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for THLV and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer