PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THFF vs. RBCAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

THFF vs. RBCAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Financial Corporation (THFF) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THFF achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly lower than RBCAA's 22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, THFF has underperformed RBCAA with an annualized return of 10.06%, while RBCAA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.


THFF

1D
4.50%
1M
5.12%
YTD
19.08%
6M
17.58%
1Y
45.01%
3Y*
32.75%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
10.06%

RBCAA

1D
3.98%
1M
10.07%
YTD
22.91%
6M
23.72%
1Y
26.23%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
14.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THFF vs. RBCAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THFF
First Financial Corporation
19.08%36.17%11.11%-2.62%4.45%19.47%-12.74%16.79%-9.41%-9.54%
RBCAA
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
22.91%1.29%30.27%39.36%-16.94%44.53%-20.18%23.71%4.17%-1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between THFF and RBCAA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 1998

0.52

Over the past year, THFF and RBCAA have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

THFF:

$839.68M

RBCAA:

$1.67B

EPS

THFF:

$6.80

RBCAA:

$4.24

PE Ratio

THFF:

10.39

RBCAA:

19.83

PEG Ratio

THFF:

0.53

RBCAA:

1.62

PS Ratio

THFF:

2.61

RBCAA:

4.69

PB Ratio

THFF:

1.28

RBCAA:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

THFF:

$320.85M

RBCAA:

$355.22M

Gross Profit (TTM)

THFF:

$193.05M

RBCAA:

$264.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

THFF:

$81.43M

RBCAA:

$112.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THFF vs. RBCAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THFF
THFF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
THFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
THFF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
THFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
THFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

RBCAA
RBCAA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RBCAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBCAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBCAA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RBCAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBCAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THFF vs. RBCAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Financial Corporation (THFF) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


THFFRBCAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.65

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

3.44

+5.43

THFF vs. RBCAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the RBCAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THFF and RBCAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THFFRBCAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.00

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.45

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

THFF vs. RBCAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THFF drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, smaller than the maximum RBCAA drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THFF and RBCAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THFFRBCAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-64.45%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-15.98%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-21.56%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.92%

-31.07%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.73%

-44.67%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-19.98%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

7.63%

-2.54%

Volatility

THFF vs. RBCAA - Volatility Comparison

First Financial Corporation (THFF) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) at 6.85%. This indicates that THFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBCAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THFFRBCAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

6.85%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.79%

19.01%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.11%

26.33%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.50%

27.90%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.23%

32.93%

-3.70%

Dividends

THFF vs. RBCAA - Dividend Comparison

THFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than RBCAA's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBCAA
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
2.20%2.61%2.33%2.71%3.33%2.42%3.17%2.26%2.50%2.29%2.09%2.96%
THFF
First Financial Corporation
3.03%3.38%2.92%4.02%2.54%2.34%2.68%2.25%2.54%5.51%1.88%2.88%

Financials

THFF vs. RBCAA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Financial Corporation and Republic Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
77.95M
0
(THFF) Total Revenue
(RBCAA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


THFF and RBCAA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THFF has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to RBCAA (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THFF dropped -51.80% vs RBCAA's -64.45%.

THFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THFF and RBCAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer