THFF vs. TRI
THFF (First Financial Corporation) and TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp) are both stocks. THFF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while TRI operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, THFF returned 11.02%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for TRI. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
THFF vs. TRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THFF achieves a 36.76% return, which is significantly higher than TRI's -24.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with THFF having a 11.02% annualized return and TRI not far ahead at 11.46%.
THFF
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 25.63%
- YTD
- 36.76%
- 1Y
- 59.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.79%
- 5Y*
- 18.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
TRI
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- 6M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -24.48%
- 1Y
- -50.08%
- 3Y*
- -8.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.65M | $8.09M | $7.71M | |
| $223.40M | $210.33M | $189.87M |
THFF vs. TRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THFF First Financial Corporation | 36.76% | 36.17% | 11.11% | -2.62% | 4.45% | 19.47% | -12.74% | 16.79% | -9.41% | -9.54% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -24.48% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between THFF and TRI is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2002 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between THFF and TRI has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
THFF:
$957.89M
TRI:
$42.84B
THFF:
$7.14
TRI:
$3.43
THFF:
11.28
TRI:
28.59
THFF:
2.98
TRI:
5.69
THFF:
1.42
TRI:
3.63
THFF:
$320.51M
TRI:
$7.66B
THFF:
$188.89M
TRI:
$4.11B
THFF:
$72.01M
TRI:
$3.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THFF vs. TRI — Risk / Return Rank
THFF
TRI
THFF vs. TRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Financial Corporation (THFF) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THFF | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.79 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | -0.81 | +5.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | -1.15 | +12.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THFF vs. TRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THFF drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, smaller than the maximum TRI drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THFF and TRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THFF | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.80% | -63.45% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.18% | -61.58% | +48.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | -63.45% | +43.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.92% | -63.45% | +28.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.73% | -63.45% | +20.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -53.14% | +52.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -11.83% | -4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 43.50% | -38.71% |
Volatility
THFF vs. TRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Financial Corporation (THFF) is 6.86%, while Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a volatility of 18.59%. This indicates that THFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THFF | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 18.59% | -11.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 42.02% | -25.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.31% | 46.60% | -20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 27.50% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 24.38% | +4.88% |
Dividends
THFF vs. TRI - Dividend Comparison
THFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than TRI's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THFF First Financial Corporation | 2.72% | 3.38% | 2.92% | 4.02% | 2.54% | 2.34% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.54% | 5.51% | 1.88% | 2.88% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 4.04% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Financials
THFF vs. TRI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Financial Corporation and Thomson Reuters Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
THFF vs. TRI - Profitability Comparison
THFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 84.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a gross profit of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
THFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 84.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported an operating income of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.
THFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a net income of 22.74M and revenue of 84.22M, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.
TRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a net income of 452.64M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
THFF and TRI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRI has higher volatility (18.59%) compared to THFF (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THFF dropped -51.80% vs TRI's -63.45%.
THFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for THFF and TRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer