RBCAA vs. CNS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBCAA (Republic Bancorp, Inc.) and CNS (Cohen & Steers, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — RBCAA in Banks - Regional, CNS in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA returned 14.76%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for CNS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBCAA vs. CNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBCAA achieves a 18.21% return, which is significantly higher than CNS's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA has outperformed CNS with an annualized return of 14.76%, while CNS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.

RBCAA

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 18.21%
• 6M: 16.51%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 14.76%

CNS

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 14.03%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: -4.13%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: 11.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBCAA vs. CNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc.	18.21%	1.29%	30.27%	39.36%	-16.94%	44.53%	-20.18%	23.71%	4.17%	-1.55%
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc.	14.03%	-29.77%	25.53%	21.84%	-28.00%	29.00%	23.45%	93.97%	-19.74%	48.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RBCAA and CNS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2004	0.43

The correlation between RBCAA and CNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBCAA : $1.61B CNS : $3.62B
EPS RBCAA : $4.24 CNS : $3.02
PE Ratio RBCAA : 19.08 CNS : 23.23
PS Ratio RBCAA : 4.51 CNS : 6.30
PB Ratio RBCAA : 1.42 CNS : 6.43
Total Revenue (TTM) RBCAA : $355.22M CNS : $574.61M
Gross Profit (TTM) RBCAA : $264.60M CNS : $381.59M
EBITDA (TTM) RBCAA : $112.84M CNS : $206.82M

Return for Risk

RBCAA vs. CNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBCAA

RBCAA Risk / Return Rank: 63
RBCAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
RBCAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RBCAA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RBCAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RBCAA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CNS

CNS Risk / Return Rank: 33
CNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CNS Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CNS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBCAA vs. CNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBCAA	CNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	-0.16	+0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	-0.04	+1.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.00	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	-0.18	+1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.58	-0.32	+2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBCAA vs. CNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBCAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the CNS Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBCAA and CNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBCAA	CNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	-0.16	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.08	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.34	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.34	-0.09

Drawdowns

RBCAA vs. CNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBCAA drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum CNS drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCAA and CNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBCAA	CNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.45%	-85.40%	+20.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.98%	-23.32%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.56%	-42.59%	+21.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.07%	-46.25%	+15.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.67%	-55.06%	+10.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-30.63%	+28.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-23.20%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.63%	12.78%	-5.15%

Volatility

RBCAA vs. CNS - Volatility Comparison

Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) have volatilities of 5.85% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBCAA	CNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	5.64%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.68%	16.55%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.06%	26.20%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.84%	29.92%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.92%	32.95%	-0.03%

Dividends

RBCAA vs. CNS - Dividend Comparison

RBCAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than CNS's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc.	3.68%	3.95%	2.56%	3.01%	3.41%	3.30%	3.45%	5.48%	11.13%	4.48%	4.58%	5.43%
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc.	2.28%	2.61%	2.33%	2.71%	3.33%	2.42%	3.17%	2.26%	2.50%	2.29%	2.09%	2.96%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBCAA and CNS in my portfolio?

RBCAA and CNS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBCAA or CNS?

RBCAA has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to CNS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBCAA dropped -64.45% vs CNS's -85.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBCAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.