RBCAA vs. CNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RBCAA or CNS.
Correlation
The correlation between RBCAA and CNS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RBCAA vs. CNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RBCAA:
0.92
CNS:
1.00
RBCAA:
1.57
CNS:
1.53
RBCAA:
1.19
CNS:
1.19
RBCAA:
2.02
CNS:
1.07
RBCAA:
3.82
CNS:
4.81
RBCAA:
8.87%
CNS:
6.43%
RBCAA:
36.69%
CNS:
30.99%
RBCAA:
-64.60%
CNS:
-85.40%
RBCAA:
-8.21%
CNS:
-13.24%
Fundamentals
RBCAA:
$1.46B
CNS:
$4.91B
RBCAA:
$5.26
CNS:
$2.68
RBCAA:
14.28
CNS:
36.25
RBCAA:
1.75
CNS:
2.77
RBCAA:
$461.87M
CNS:
$497.54M
RBCAA:
$525.76M
CNS:
$374.75M
RBCAA:
$120.67M
CNS:
$196.18M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBCAA achieves a 32.93% return, which is significantly higher than CNS's 25.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA has outperformed CNS with an annualized return of 14.03%, while CNS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.02% annualized return.
RBCAA
32.93%
-4.18%
48.10%
32.81%
12.30%
14.03%
CNS
25.73%
-7.19%
30.79%
29.79%
11.21%
13.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RBCAA vs. CNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RBCAA vs. CNS - Dividend Comparison
RBCAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than CNS's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 1.70% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% | 2.98% | 2.82% |
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 2.55% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 2.81% | 2.92% | 4.91% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 4.92% | 4.47% | 4.49% |
Drawdowns
RBCAA vs. CNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCAA drawdown since its inception was -64.60%, smaller than the maximum CNS drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCAA and CNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RBCAA vs. CNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) is 8.49%, while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that RBCAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RBCAA vs. CNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cohen & Steers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities