PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RBCAA vs. CNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RBCAACNS
YTD Return42.09%36.12%
1Y Return65.43%74.59%
3Y Return (Ann)14.88%3.49%
5Y Return (Ann)14.30%12.12%
10Y Return (Ann)15.86%13.65%
Sharpe Ratio1.742.53
Sortino Ratio2.553.30
Omega Ratio1.311.41
Calmar Ratio3.812.05
Martin Ratio7.2913.41
Ulcer Index8.79%6.08%
Daily Std Dev36.91%32.27%
Max Drawdown-64.60%-85.40%
Current Drawdown-1.88%-5.41%

Fundamentals


RBCAACNS
Market Cap$1.52B$5.31B
EPS$5.26$2.61
PE Ratio14.8539.17
PEG Ratio1.752.39
Total Revenue (TTM)$493.65M$511.10M
Gross Profit (TTM)$493.98M$442.34M
EBITDA (TTM)$40.92M$208.06M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RBCAA and CNS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RBCAA vs. CNS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RBCAA achieves a 42.09% return, which is significantly higher than CNS's 36.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA has outperformed CNS with an annualized return of 15.86%, while CNS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
42.62%
38.37%
RBCAA
CNS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RBCAA vs. CNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBCAA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RBCAA, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RBCAA, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RBCAA, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RBCAA, currently valued at 3.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RBCAA, currently valued at 7.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.29
CNS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNS, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNS, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNS, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNS, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNS, currently valued at 13.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0013.41

RBCAA vs. CNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBCAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the CNS Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBCAA and CNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.74
2.53
RBCAA
CNS

Dividends

RBCAA vs. CNS - Dividend Comparison

RBCAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than CNS's 1.76% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RBCAA
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
2.08%2.71%3.33%2.42%3.17%2.26%2.50%2.29%2.09%2.96%2.98%2.82%
CNS
Cohen & Steers, Inc.
1.76%3.01%3.41%1.95%2.10%2.29%11.13%4.48%4.58%4.92%4.47%4.49%

Drawdowns

RBCAA vs. CNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBCAA drawdown since its inception was -64.60%, smaller than the maximum CNS drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCAA and CNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.88%
-5.41%
RBCAA
CNS

Volatility

RBCAA vs. CNS - Volatility Comparison

Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) has a higher volatility of 16.42% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) at 8.00%. This indicates that RBCAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.42%
8.00%
RBCAA
CNS

Financials

RBCAA vs. CNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cohen & Steers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items