RBCAA vs. CNS
RBCAA (Republic Bancorp, Inc.) and CNS (Cohen & Steers, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — RBCAA in Banks - Regional, CNS in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA returned 15.57%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for CNS. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBCAA vs. CNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBCAA achieves a 27.98% return, which is significantly higher than CNS's 23.52% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCAA has outperformed CNS with an annualized return of 15.57%, while CNS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.
RBCAA
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 27.98%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 30.45%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
CNS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
RBCAA vs. CNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 27.98% | 1.29% | 30.27% | 39.36% | -16.94% | 44.53% | -20.18% | 23.71% | 4.17% | -1.55% |
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 23.52% | -29.77% | 25.53% | 21.84% | -28.00% | 29.00% | 23.45% | 93.97% | -19.74% | 48.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBCAA and CNS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2004 | 0.43 |
The correlation between RBCAA and CNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RBCAA:
$1.73B
CNS:
$3.92B
RBCAA:
$4.24
CNS:
$3.02
RBCAA:
20.53
CNS:
25.17
RBCAA:
4.86
CNS:
6.82
RBCAA:
1.52
CNS:
6.96
RBCAA:
$355.22M
CNS:
$574.61M
RBCAA:
$264.60M
CNS:
$381.59M
RBCAA:
$112.84M
CNS:
$206.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBCAA vs. CNS — Risk / Return Rank
RBCAA
CNS
RBCAA vs. CNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.17 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 0.30 | +3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBCAA vs. CNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCAA drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum CNS drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCAA and CNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -85.40% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.98% | -23.32% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.56% | -42.59% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -46.25% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.67% | -55.06% | +10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -24.85% | +24.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -23.20% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.62% | 12.78% | -5.16% |
Volatility
RBCAA vs. CNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) is 7.27%, while Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that RBCAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.27% | 8.71% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 17.64% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.17% | 27.00% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 30.08% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 32.99% | -0.08% |
Dividends
RBCAA vs. CNS - Dividend Comparison
RBCAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than CNS's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 3.39% | 3.95% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 3.45% | 5.48% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.43% |
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 2.17% | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% |
Financials
RBCAA vs. CNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cohen & Steers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RBCAA and CNS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNS has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to RBCAA (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBCAA dropped -64.45% vs CNS's -85.40%.
RBCAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBCAA and CNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer