RBCAA vs. CNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS).
Performance
RBCAA vs. CNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBCAA vs. CNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 3.61% | 1.29% | 30.27% | 39.36% | -16.94% | 44.53% | -20.18% | 23.71% | 4.17% | -1.55% |
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | -0.00% | -29.77% | 25.53% | 21.84% | -28.00% | 29.00% | 23.45% | 93.97% | -19.74% | 48.05% |
Fundamentals
RBCAA:
$1.40B
CNS:
$3.21B
RBCAA:
$5.48
CNS:
$2.81
RBCAA:
12.95
CNS:
22.11
RBCAA:
3.53
CNS:
5.64
RBCAA:
1.27
CNS:
5.71
RBCAA:
$397.88M
CNS:
$567.80M
RBCAA:
$296.94M
CNS:
$326.52M
RBCAA:
$149.08M
CNS:
$200.44M
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, RBCAA has outperformed CNS with an annualized return of 13.66%, while CNS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.
RBCAA
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
CNS
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -1.83%
- 1Y
- -20.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBCAA vs. CNS — Risk / Return Rank
RBCAA
CNS
RBCAA vs. CNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) and Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | -0.68 | +1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | -0.87 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.90 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.71 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | -1.20 | +3.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | -0.68 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.06 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.29 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.32 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBCAA and CNS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RBCAA vs. CNS - Dividend Comparison
RBCAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than CNS's 4.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCAA Republic Bancorp, Inc. | 2.60% | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.71% | 3.33% | 2.42% | 3.17% | 2.26% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.09% | 2.96% |
CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 4.07% | 3.95% | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 3.45% | 5.48% | 11.13% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.43% |
Drawdowns
RBCAA vs. CNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCAA drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum CNS drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCAA and CNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.45% | -85.40% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.98% | -27.80% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -46.25% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.67% | -55.06% | +10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -39.17% | +32.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -23.12% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 16.50% | -8.67% |
Volatility
RBCAA vs. CNS - Volatility Comparison
Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS) at 5.88%. This indicates that RBCAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBCAA | CNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 5.88% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.37% | 18.95% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 29.61% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.64% | 29.94% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 33.00% | -0.16% |
Financials
RBCAA vs. CNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Bancorp, Inc. and Cohen & Steers, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities