TGT vs. AFL
TGT (Target Corporation) and AFL (Aflac Incorporated) are both stocks. TGT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while AFL operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TGT returned 10.35%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for AFL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGT vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a 38.37% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 10.35%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return.
TGT
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 38.37%
- 6M
- 39.48%
- 1Y
- 41.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- -7.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
AFL
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.69%
TGT vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGT Target Corporation | 38.37% | -24.50% | -2.27% | -1.35% | -34.24% | 32.91% | 40.47% | 100.17% | 4.67% | -5.84% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 6.72% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGT and AFL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.29 |
The correlation between TGT and AFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGT:
$60.46B
AFL:
$59.95B
TGT:
$7.93
AFL:
$8.76
TGT:
16.72
AFL:
13.30
TGT:
0.57
AFL:
3.38
TGT:
3.69
AFL:
2.67
TGT:
$105.47B
AFL:
$18.22B
TGT:
$27.05B
AFL:
$8.70B
TGT:
$8.20B
AFL:
$6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGT vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
TGT
AFL
TGT vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGT | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 1.91 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 4.75 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGT vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and AFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGT | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -82.71% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.27% | -9.11% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.78% | -13.56% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.40% | -19.86% | -44.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.40% | -54.89% | -9.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.46% | -1.51% | -40.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.10% | -11.65% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 3.66% | +4.96% |
Volatility
TGT vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.58%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGT | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 5.58% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.39% | 12.26% | +9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.15% | 17.06% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.48% | 20.94% | +14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.27% | 25.76% | +7.51% |
Dividends
TGT vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than AFL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.04% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
TGT Target Corporation | 3.44% | 4.62% | 3.28% | 3.06% | 2.66% | 1.37% | 1.52% | 2.03% | 3.81% | 3.74% | 3.21% | 2.97% |
Financials
TGT vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGT vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison
TGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.46B and revenue of 24.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
TGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
TGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 942.00M and revenue of 24.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGT and AFL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGT has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to AFL (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGT dropped -64.40% vs AFL's -82.71%.
TGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGT and AFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer