PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TGT vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TGT and COST is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

TGT vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Target Corporation (TGT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%14,000.00%16,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4,081.20%
15,588.36%
TGT
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TGT:

-0.06

COST:

2.43

Sortino Ratio

TGT:

0.17

COST:

3.01

Omega Ratio

TGT:

1.03

COST:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

TGT:

-0.05

COST:

4.45

Martin Ratio

TGT:

-0.17

COST:

11.50

Ulcer Index

TGT:

13.37%

COST:

3.97%

Daily Std Dev

TGT:

37.11%

COST:

18.82%

Max Drawdown

TGT:

-62.96%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

TGT:

-46.74%

COST:

-3.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TGT:

$60.30B

COST:

$435.99B

EPS

TGT:

$9.43

COST:

$16.98

PE Ratio

TGT:

13.96

COST:

57.84

PEG Ratio

TGT:

1.83

COST:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

TGT:

$107.57B

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TGT:

$29.92B

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

TGT:

$6.84B

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGT achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 47.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TGT has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 8.91%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.


TGT

YTD

-5.51%

1M

-15.91%

6M

-6.92%

1Y

-3.58%

5Y*

2.59%

10Y*

8.91%

COST

YTD

47.01%

1M

4.92%

6M

11.10%

1Y

46.43%

5Y*

29.02%

10Y*

23.77%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TGT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Target Corporation (TGT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TGT, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.062.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for TGT, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.173.01
The chart of Omega ratio for TGT, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for TGT, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.054.45
The chart of Martin ratio for TGT, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.1711.50
TGT
COST

The current TGT Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGT and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.06
2.43
TGT
COST

Dividends

TGT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than COST's 2.02% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TGT
Target Corporation
3.40%3.06%2.66%1.37%1.52%2.03%3.81%3.74%3.21%2.97%2.50%2.50%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.02%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

TGT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGT drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGT and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-46.74%
-3.01%
TGT
COST

Volatility

TGT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Target Corporation (TGT) has a higher volatility of 25.74% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.79%. This indicates that TGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
25.74%
4.79%
TGT
COST

Financials

TGT vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Target Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab