TGLS vs. FN
TGLS (Tecnoglass Inc.) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. TGLS operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TGLS returned 17.38%/yr vs 32.80%/yr for FN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TGLS vs. FN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLS achieves a -15.56% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 36.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TGLS has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 17.38%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 32.80% annualized return.
TGLS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- -15.56%
- 6M
- -16.64%
- 1Y
- -51.61%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
FN
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 36.99%
- 6M
- 27.02%
- 1Y
- 165.46%
- 3Y*
- 76.72%
- 5Y*
- 45.90%
- 10Y*
- 32.80%
TGLS vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc. | -15.56% | -35.98% | 74.88% | 49.86% | 18.91% | 281.83% | -14.53% | 10.03% | 15.12% | -36.04% |
FN Fabrinet | 36.99% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLS and FN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2012 | 0.21 |
The correlation between TGLS and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TGLS:
$1.89B
FN:
$22.59B
TGLS:
$3.24
FN:
$11.65
TGLS:
13.08
FN:
53.55
TGLS:
0.39
FN:
2.29
TGLS:
1.93
FN:
5.32
TGLS:
2.57
FN:
9.80
TGLS:
$1.01B
FN:
$4.24B
TGLS:
$419.72M
FN:
$509.75M
TGLS:
$251.16M
FN:
$422.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLS vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank
TGLS
FN
TGLS vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TGLS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.36 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 8.10 | -9.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 19.43 | -20.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TGLS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.32 | 2.50 | -3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.86 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.59 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
TGLS vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLS and FN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.32% | -70.46% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.42% | -20.55% | -35.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.55% | -37.47% | -19.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -38.70% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.98% | -51.11% | -26.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -16.45% | -35.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.93% | -22.58% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.03% | 8.55% | +29.48% |
Volatility
TGLS vs. FN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) is 14.40%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 25.81%. This indicates that TGLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 25.81% | -11.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.72% | 55.79% | -26.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.17% | 66.78% | -27.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.88% | 53.58% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.26% | 48.27% | +5.99% |
Dividends
TGLS vs. FN - Dividend Comparison
TGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TGLS Tecnoglass Inc. | 1.42% | 1.19% | 0.61% | 0.79% | 0.91% | 0.56% | 1.59% | 6.79% | 5.20% | 7.21% | 2.04% |
Financials
TGLS vs. FN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tecnoglass Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TGLS vs. FN - Profitability Comparison
TGLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a gross profit of 95.83M and revenue of 249.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
TGLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
TGLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a net income of 31.89M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLS and FN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (25.81%) compared to TGLS (14.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLS dropped -81.32% vs FN's -70.46%.
FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGLS and FN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer