PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLS vs. PRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLS vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLS achieves a -7.93% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TGLS has outperformed PRF with an annualized return of 18.58%, while PRF has yielded a comparatively lower 14.01% annualized return.


TGLS

1D
0.44%
1M
12.17%
YTD
-7.93%
6M
-8.78%
1Y
-36.49%
3Y*
-0.59%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
18.58%

PRF

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.07%
YTD
15.07%
6M
14.51%
1Y
32.54%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLS vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
-7.93%-35.98%74.88%49.86%18.91%281.83%-14.53%10.03%15.12%-36.04%
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
15.07%18.33%16.73%15.72%-7.79%31.12%7.78%27.42%-8.71%16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLS and PRF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2012

0.31

The correlation between TGLS and PRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLS vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLS
TGLS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PRF
PRF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLS vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGLSPRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.54

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

4.96

-5.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

20.23

-21.25

TGLS vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLS and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGLS vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than PRF's maximum drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLS and PRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLSPRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.32%

-60.35%

-20.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.83%

-6.59%

-47.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.55%

-15.82%

-40.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.55%

-19.72%

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.98%

-38.16%

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.23%

-1.18%

-46.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.05%

-6.91%

-16.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.70%

1.61%

+34.09%

Volatility

TGLS vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 3.66%. This indicates that TGLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLSPRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

3.66%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.07%

8.22%

+21.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.19%

10.99%

+28.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.35%

15.20%

+38.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.27%

17.69%

+36.58%

Dividends

TGLS vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

TGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than PRF's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.38%1.59%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
1.30%1.19%0.61%0.79%0.91%0.56%1.59%6.79%5.20%7.21%2.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLS and PRF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGLS has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to PRF (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLS dropped -81.32% vs PRF's -60.35%.

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLS and PRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer