TGLR vs. TBG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TGLR (Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF) and TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGLR is a Dividend fund actively managed by Wedbush, while TBG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TBG. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TGLR returned 25.36% vs 21.75% for TBG. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TGLR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TBG.

Performance

TGLR vs. TBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than TBG's 15.96% return.

TGLR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 7.68%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 1Y: 25.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.26%

TBG

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 9.04%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	$980.55K	$1.02M	$886.99K
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	$127.00K	$118.29K	$218.46K

TGLR vs. TBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	13.03%	23.30%	18.71%	9.89%
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	15.96%	7.50%	20.58%	9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLR and TBG is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.65

The correlation between TGLR and TBG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TGLR vs. TBG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TGLR	TBG
Technology	24.6%	9.3%
Financial Services	15.2%	14.2%
Industrials	15.0%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	8.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	16.4%
Energy	7.6%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	10.7%
Communication Services	3.7%	3.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.5%
Utilities	2.1%	6.8%
Real Estate	2.1%	12.8%

Return for Risk

TGLR vs. TBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGLR

TGLR Risk / Return Rank: 80
TGLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TGLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TGLR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
TGLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TGLR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TBG

TBG Risk / Return Rank: 86
TBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TBG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TBG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGLR vs. TBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TGLR	TBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.23	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.30	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.56	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.79	11.05	+0.74

TGLR vs. TBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the TBG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGLR and TBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TGLR vs. TBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLR drawdown since its inception was -19.82%, which is greater than TBG's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLR and TBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGLR	TBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.82%	-14.76%	-5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-6.13%	-2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.04%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.33%	-2.03%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.97%	+0.19%

Volatility

TGLR vs. TBG - Volatility Comparison

Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) at 3.33%. This indicates that TGLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGLR	TBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	3.33%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	7.38%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	9.81%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	12.18%	+2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	12.18%	+2.99%

TGLR vs. TBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TGLR vs. TBG - Dividend Comparison

TGLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than TBG's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	2.59%	2.80%	2.33%	0.48%
TGLR Wedbush LAFFER|TENGLER New Era Value ETF	0.93%	1.16%	1.02%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGLR and TBG in my portfolio?

TGLR and TBG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGLR or TBG?

TGLR has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to TBG (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGLR dropped -19.82% vs TBG's -14.76%.

Which ETF is better, TGLR or TBG?

On 1-year performance, TGLR leads with 25.36% vs 21.75% for TBG. On fees, TBG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TBG has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TGLR or TBG?

Over the 1-year period, TGLR has performed better with a 25.36% return vs 21.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TGLR or TBG?

TBG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TGLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TGLR or TBG?

TBG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.93% for TGLR.

What is the main difference between TGLR and TBG?

TGLR is categorized as Dividend, while TBG is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and TBG. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TGLR and 0.59% for TBG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.