TBG vs. VIG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TBG, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. TBG is actively managed, while VIG is passively managed. Over the past year, TBG returned 21.37% vs 19.10% for VIG. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TBG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.

Performance

TBG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBG achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 9.71% return.

TBG

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 9.16%
• YTD: 15.60%
• 1Y: 21.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.91%

VIG

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 7.64%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 13.03%
• ALL TIME*: 10.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	$1.11M	$997.25K	$891.95K
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF	$229.58M	$245.27M	$258.85M

TBG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	15.60%	7.50%	20.58%	9.55%
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF	9.71%	14.17%	16.99%	8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TBG and VIG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.76

The correlation between TBG and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TBG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TBG	VIG
Healthcare	16.4%	17.8%
Financial Services	14.2%	20.3%
Energy	13.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	12.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	9.2%
Technology	9.3%	26.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	4.5%
Utilities	6.8%	3.0%
Industrials	3.7%	11.9%
Communication Services	3.2%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.5%	3.4%

Return for Risk

TBG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TBG

TBG Risk / Return Rank: 85
TBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
TBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
TBG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TBG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

VIG

VIG Risk / Return Rank: 75
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TBG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TBG	VIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.79	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	2.58	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	2.28	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	9.28	+1.10

TBG vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBG and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TBG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBG drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBG and VIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBG	VIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-46.81%	+32.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-7.91%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-1.06%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-5.47%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.94%	+0.03%

Volatility

TBG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.69%. This indicates that TBG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBG	VIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	2.69%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.42%	7.61%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	10.14%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	14.20%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	16.02%	-3.83%

TBG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

TBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VIG's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	2.59%	2.80%	2.33%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF	1.50%	1.62%	1.73%	1.88%	1.96%	1.55%	1.63%	1.71%	2.08%	1.88%	2.14%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBG and VIG in my portfolio?

TBG and VIG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBG or VIG?

TBG has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VIG (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBG dropped -14.76% vs VIG's -46.81%.

Which ETF is better, TBG or VIG?

On 1-year performance, TBG leads with 21.37% vs 19.10% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBG or VIG?

Over the 1-year period, TBG has performed better with a 21.37% return vs 19.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBG or VIG?

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBG or VIG?

TBG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.50% for VIG.

What is the main difference between TBG and VIG?

TBG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VIG is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: TBG and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TBG and 0.04% for VIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.