TBG vs. DIVP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) and DIVP (Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by EA Series Trust, while DIVP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Cullen. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TBG returned 20.42% vs 14.84% for DIVP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TBG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DIVP.

Performance

TBG vs. DIVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBG achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than DIVP's 8.32% return.

TBG

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVP

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 14.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBG vs. DIVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	11.50%	7.50%	14.82%
DIVP Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF	8.32%	7.76%	5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TBG and DIVP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.88

The correlation between TBG and DIVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TBG vs. DIVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TBG	DIVP
Healthcare	15.1%	17.9%
Energy	14.4%	11.6%
Financial Services	13.8%	16.1%
Consumer Defensive	13.1%	9.0%
Real Estate	12.2%	6.5%
Technology	9.3%	8.6%
Utilities	6.8%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	4.4%
Industrials	4.4%	9.3%
Communication Services	3.7%	8.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.4%

Return for Risk

TBG vs. DIVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBG

TBG Risk / Return Rank: 63
TBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TBG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
TBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TBG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

DIVP

DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 41
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBG vs. DIVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TBG	DIVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.47	+0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.18	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.25	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.38	+0.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	5.82	+4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TBG vs. DIVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the DIVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBG and DIVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TBG	DIVP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.47	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.84	+0.78

Drawdowns

TBG vs. DIVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBG drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than DIVP's maximum drawdown of -12.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBG and DIVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TBG	DIVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-12.26%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.13%	-6.28%	+0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.39%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.11%	-2.44%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.57%	-0.59%

Volatility

TBG vs. DIVP - Volatility Comparison

TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) have volatilities of 2.54% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TBG	DIVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	2.62%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.60%	7.16%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.48%	10.12%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.21%	11.79%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.21%	11.79%	+0.42%

TBG vs. DIVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVP's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

TBG vs. DIVP - Dividend Comparison

TBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than DIVP's 5.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DIVP Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF	5.67%	6.06%	5.92%	0.00%
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	2.67%	2.80%	2.33%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TBG and DIVP in my portfolio?

TBG and DIVP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TBG or DIVP?

DIVP has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to TBG (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBG dropped -14.76% vs DIVP's -12.26%.

Which ETF is better, TBG or DIVP?

On 1-year performance, TBG leads with 20.42% vs 14.84% for DIVP. On fees, DIVP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TBG or DIVP?

Over the 1-year period, TBG has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 14.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TBG or DIVP?

DIVP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TBG or DIVP?

DIVP has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 2.67% for TBG.

What is the main difference between TBG and DIVP?

TBG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVP is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: EA Series Trust and Cullen. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TBG and 0.55% for DIVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.