PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBG vs. DIVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBG vs. DIVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBG vs. DIVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TBG
TBG Dividend Focus ETF
4.60%7.50%14.82%
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
3.78%7.76%5.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBG achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than DIVP's 3.78% return.


TBG

1D
-0.46%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
4.60%
6M
6.22%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVP

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
3.78%
6M
5.70%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBG vs. DIVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVP's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TBG vs. DIVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBG
TBG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVP
DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBG vs. DIVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) and Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBGDIVPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

0.44

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

0.69

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.51

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.99

1.68

+1.31

TBG vs. DIVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBG Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the DIVP Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBG and DIVP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBGDIVPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

0.44

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.71

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between TBG and DIVP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TBG vs. DIVP - Dividend Comparison

TBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than DIVP's 5.90% yield.


TTM202520242023
TBG
TBG Dividend Focus ETF
2.84%2.80%2.33%0.48%
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
5.90%6.06%5.92%0.00%

Drawdowns

TBG vs. DIVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBG drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than DIVP's maximum drawdown of -12.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBG and DIVP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBGDIVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-12.26%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-10.95%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-4.53%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-2.44%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.33%

-0.27%

Volatility

TBG vs. DIVP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) is 2.81%, while Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that TBG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBGDIVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.07%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

7.45%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

13.79%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

11.96%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.39%

11.96%

+0.43%