PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFC vs. LYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TFC vs. LYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFC achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than LYB's 52.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TFC has outperformed LYB with an annualized return of 7.25%, while LYB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.


TFC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
2.06%
6M
5.66%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
7.25%

LYB

1D
-2.54%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
52.35%
6M
52.17%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
-4.03%
5Y*
-4.78%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFC vs. LYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
2.06%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52.35%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TFC and LYB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2010

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between TFC and LYB has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

TFC:

$4.28

LYB:

-$3.19

PS Ratio

TFC:

2.08

LYB:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

TFC:

$30.47B

LYB:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TFC:

$19.17B

LYB:

-$4.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

TFC:

$6.99B

LYB:

$935.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFC vs. LYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFC vs. LYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFCLYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.71

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

1.26

+2.59

TFC vs. LYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the LYB Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFC and LYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFCLYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

0.54

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.15

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.14

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.40

-0.12

Drawdowns

TFC vs. LYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFC drawdown since its inception was -66.56%, which is greater than LYB's maximum drawdown of -63.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFC and LYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFCLYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.56%

-63.26%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-35.45%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-55.35%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.11%

-55.35%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

-63.26%

+4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.01%

-28.50%

+18.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-15.11%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

19.88%

-12.12%

Volatility

TFC vs. LYB - Volatility Comparison

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) at 7.40%. This indicates that TFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFCLYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

7.40%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

34.97%

-17.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

46.09%

-22.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

32.84%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.61%

36.75%

-3.14%

Dividends

TFC vs. LYB - Dividend Comparison

TFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than LYB's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.39%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.23%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Financials

TFC vs. LYB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Truist Financial Corporation and LyondellBasell Industries N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
7.41B
0
(TFC) Total Revenue
(LYB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TFC and LYB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFC has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to LYB (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFC dropped -66.56% vs LYB's -63.26%.

TFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFC and LYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer