PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYB vs. DEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYB vs. DEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Diageo plc ADR (DEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYB achieves a 44.34% return, which is significantly higher than DEO's 2.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LYB has outperformed DEO with an annualized return of 5.77%, while DEO has yielded a comparatively lower -0.14% annualized return.


LYB

1D
0.81%
1M
14.52%
6M
16.93%
YTD
44.34%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
-8.00%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
5.77%
ALL TIME*
13.98%

DEO

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.90%
6M
-4.72%
YTD
2.84%
1Y
-7.26%
3Y*
-17.17%
5Y*
-12.96%
10Y*
-0.14%
ALL TIME*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.27M$83.46M$93.27M
$293.61M$297.33M$323.21M

LYB vs. DEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
44.34%-35.96%-17.38%20.70%-0.98%5.07%2.64%44.63%-21.69%33.72%
DEO
Diageo plc ADR
2.84%-29.31%-10.09%-16.28%-17.40%41.72%-3.26%21.39%-0.43%44.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LYB and DEO is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between LYB and DEO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYB:

$19.73B

DEO:

$48.82B

EPS

LYB:

-$1.61

DEO:

£9.85

PS Ratio

LYB:

0.67

DEO:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYB:

$22.02B

DEO:

£37.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYB:

-$5.07B

DEO:

£22.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYB:

$2.14B

DEO:

£10.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYB vs. DEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYB
LYB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
LYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DEO
DEO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYB vs. DEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) and Diageo plc ADR (DEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYBDEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.99

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

-0.21

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

-0.33

+2.07

LYB vs. DEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the DEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYB and DEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYB vs. DEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYB drawdown since its inception was -63.26%, roughly equal to the maximum DEO drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYB and DEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYBDEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-63.41%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.51%

-35.52%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.35%

-54.50%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.35%

-63.41%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.26%

-63.41%

+0.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.26%

-55.20%

+22.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.29%

-13.23%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.89%

22.02%

-5.13%

Volatility

LYB vs. DEO - Volatility Comparison

LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (LYB) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Diageo plc ADR (DEO) at 8.66%. This indicates that LYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYBDEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

8.66%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.23%

27.35%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.49%

32.97%

+10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.88%

25.20%

+7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.79%

23.48%

+13.31%

Dividends

LYB vs. DEO - Dividend Comparison

LYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than DEO's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEO
Diageo plc ADR
3.78%4.80%3.26%2.77%2.16%1.82%2.29%2.07%2.51%2.18%3.00%3.13%
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
6.74%12.59%7.10%5.20%11.92%4.81%4.58%20.27%4.81%3.22%3.88%3.50%

Financials

LYB vs. DEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Diageo plc ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LYB and DEO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYB has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to DEO (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYB dropped -63.26% vs DEO's -63.41%.

LYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYB and DEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer