PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TESL vs. MTBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TESL vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TESL achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's -0.06% return.


TESL

1D
-6.80%
1M
-14.12%
YTD
-12.28%
6M
-17.99%
1Y
-31.81%
3Y*
26.19%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*

MTBA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TESL vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
-12.28%-14.73%152.27%9.18%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-0.06%7.74%1.99%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TESL and MTBA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TESL vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TESL
TESL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TESL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TESL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TESL vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TESLMTBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.28

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

1.57

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

4.96

-5.94

TESL vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TESL and MTBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TESL vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TESL drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TESL and MTBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TESLMTBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.11%

-3.48%

-65.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.12%

-2.82%

-53.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.57%

-1.44%

-44.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.71%

-0.80%

-36.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.64%

0.89%

+31.75%

Volatility

TESL vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.96%. This indicates that TESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TESLMTBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.88%

0.96%

+14.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.68%

2.57%

+39.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.85%

3.10%

+54.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.05%

3.95%

+47.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.14%

3.95%

+46.19%

TESL vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TESL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TESL vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

TESL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.22%, more than MTBA's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.08%5.98%6.03%0.48%0.00%
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
26.22%23.87%0.62%0.00%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


TESL and MTBA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TESL has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to MTBA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TESL dropped -69.11% vs MTBA's -3.48%.

On 1-year performance, MTBA leads with 4.42% vs -31.81% for TESL. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MTBA has performed better with a 4.42% return vs -31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for TESL.

TESL has the higher dividend yield at 26.22%, compared with 6.08% for MTBA.

TESL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for TESL and 0.15% for MTBA.

MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TESL and MTBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer