PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TESL vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TESL vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TESL achieves a -29.86% return, which is significantly lower than AGGH's -0.43% return.


TESL

1D
1.78%
1M
-21.76%
6M
-25.49%
YTD
-29.86%
1Y
-35.50%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.20%

AGGH

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.05M$4.71M$3.88M
$120.21K$121.08K$205.86K

TESL vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
-29.86%-14.73%152.27%58.33%-52.27%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.43%8.23%1.97%8.47%-8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TESL and AGGH is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TESL vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TESL
TESL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TESL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TESL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TESL vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TESLAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.16

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.71

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

4.25

-5.31

TESL vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TESL and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TESL vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TESL drawdown since its inception was -69.11%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TESL and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TESLAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.11%

-13.26%

-55.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.54%

-2.83%

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.54%

-6.68%

-51.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.48%

-2.47%

-54.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.90%

-4.34%

-33.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.03%

1.14%

+34.89%

Volatility

TESL vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF (TESL) has a higher volatility of 20.19% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.22%. This indicates that TESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TESLAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.19%

1.22%

+18.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.35%

3.50%

+37.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.04%

5.43%

+52.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.92%

8.35%

+43.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.55%

8.35%

+42.20%

TESL vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TESL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TESL vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

TESL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.55%, more than AGGH's 7.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.59%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
TESL
Simplify Volt TSLA Revolution ETF
31.55%23.87%0.62%0.00%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


TESL and AGGH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TESL has higher volatility (20.19%) compared to AGGH (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TESL dropped -69.11% vs AGGH's -13.26%.

On 3-year performance, TESL leads with 14.91% vs 4.66% for AGGH. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AGGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TESL has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for TESL.

TESL has the higher dividend yield at 31.55%, compared with 7.59% for AGGH.

TESL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for TESL and 0.33% for AGGH.

AGGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TESL and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer