TER vs. STRL
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. TER operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TER returned 34.90%/yr vs 58.67%/yr for STRL. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TER vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 90.11% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 94.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 34.90%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 58.67% annualized return.
TER
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -13.96%
- 6M
- 52.66%
- YTD
- 90.11%
- 1Y
- 243.14%
- 3Y*
- 49.54%
- 5Y*
- 24.17%
- 10Y*
- 34.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.43%
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -23.15%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 123.02%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M | |
| $1.53B | $1.39B | $1.68B |
TER vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 90.11% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 91.57% | 168.08% | 24.71% | 41.32% | 32.17% | 29.29% | -33.11% | 92.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and STRL is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, TER and STRL have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TER:
$57.56B
STRL:
$18.31B
TER:
$7.28
STRL:
$11.16
TER:
50.51
STRL:
53.46
TER:
13.02
STRL:
6.42
TER:
0.02
STRL:
15.57
TER:
$4.46B
STRL:
$2.88B
TER:
$2.65B
STRL:
$664.66M
TER:
$1.42B
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
TER
STRL
TER vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.29 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.20 | 2.46 | +4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 8.00 | +14.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -92.51% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.98% | -50.26% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -50.26% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -50.26% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -59.60% | +0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -39.95% | +15.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.54% | -46.20% | -12.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.96% | 15.44% | -4.48% |
Volatility
TER vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) is 29.42%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 31.97%. This indicates that TER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.42% | 31.97% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.50% | 71.75% | -8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.88% | 88.81% | -14.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.71% | 58.94% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.68% | 54.66% | -7.98% |
Dividends
TER vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while STRL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TER vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.62M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 437.81M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 374.53M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and STRL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRL has higher volatility (31.97%) compared to TER (29.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs STRL's -92.51%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer