PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TER vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TER vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than FDTS's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has outperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 36.09%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.


TER

1D
5.72%
1M
19.38%
YTD
108.47%
6M
108.68%
1Y
386.56%
3Y*
54.13%
5Y*
26.29%
10Y*
36.09%

FDTS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
18.78%
6M
20.77%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TER vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
108.47%54.39%16.51%24.78%-46.35%36.81%76.73%118.93%-24.37%66.16%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
18.78%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TER and FDTS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.34

The correlation between TER and FDTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TER vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TER vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TERFDTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.42

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.97

3.43

+10.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.81

11.78

+38.03

TER vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TER Sharpe Ratio is 5.56, which is higher than the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TER and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TER vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than FDTS's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TERFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.30%

-51.26%

-46.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.73%

-12.61%

-14.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.18%

-13.19%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.12%

-33.11%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

-51.26%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-4.77%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.67%

-10.64%

-48.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

3.66%

+3.83%

Volatility

TER vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) at 8.44%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TERFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.00%

8.44%

+16.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.10%

15.54%

+37.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.20%

18.27%

+48.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.20%

29.42%

+20.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.31%

24.92%

+20.39%

Dividends

TER vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than FDTS's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.12%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


TER and FDTS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TER has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to FDTS (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TER and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer