TER vs. ASML
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, TER returned 36.09%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for ASML. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TER vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 108.47% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 74.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TER having a 36.09% annualized return and ASML not far behind at 36.00%.
TER
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- 19.38%
- YTD
- 108.47%
- 6M
- 108.68%
- 1Y
- 386.56%
- 3Y*
- 54.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.29%
- 10Y*
- 36.09%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 24.09%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
TER vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 108.47% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and ASML is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 1995 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TER and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TER:
$63.56B
ASML:
$718.77B
TER:
$5.38
ASML:
€25.86
TER:
75.00
ASML:
62.30
TER:
16.91
ASML:
18.51
TER:
20.22
ASML:
29.83
TER:
$3.79B
ASML:
€33.69B
TER:
$2.23B
ASML:
€17.72B
TER:
$1.11B
ASML:
€12.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
TER
ASML
TER vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.45 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.97 | 7.83 | +6.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.81 | 21.08 | +28.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -90.00% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.73% | -17.85% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -45.38% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -56.84% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -56.84% | -2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -1.89% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.67% | -28.12% | -30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 6.63% | +0.86% |
Volatility
TER vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 17.27%. This indicates that TER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.00% | 17.27% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.10% | 34.58% | +18.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.20% | 42.75% | +24.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.20% | 42.44% | +7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.31% | 38.72% | +6.59% |
Dividends
TER vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ASML's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.47% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TER vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and ASML have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TER has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to ASML (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs ASML's -90.00%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.56 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer