TENM vs. LJUL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TENM (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF) and LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TENM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LJUL.

Performance

TENM vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TENM achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than LJUL's 2.02% return.

TENM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 5.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TENM vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF	5.48%	2.04%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	2.02%	1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TENM and LJUL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

TENM vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TENM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LJUL

LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 97
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TENM vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TENM	LJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.88	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	10.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	53.94	—

Drawdowns

TENM vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TENM drawdown since its inception was -3.61%, smaller than the maximum LJUL drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TENM and LJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TENM	LJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-4.85%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	0.00%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.69%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TENM	LJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.73%	1.58%	+5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.73%	4.30%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.73%	4.30%	+2.43%

TENM vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TENM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TENM vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison

TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than LJUL's 5.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	5.22%	5.36%	2.78%
TENM iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF	0.28%	0.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TENM and LJUL in my portfolio?

TENM and LJUL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TENM or LJUL?

On fees, TENM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TENM or LJUL?

TENM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TENM or LJUL?

LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 0.28% for TENM.

What is the main difference between TENM and LJUL?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TENM and 0.79% for LJUL.